Determinan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat dalam Perspektif Sosial-Ekonomi: Sebuah Systematic Literature Review

Penulis

  • Abdul Haris Rasyidi Palapa Nusantara Islamic Education College, Lombok, Indonesia Penulis
  • Amir Hamzah Kajian Advokasi Sosial Serta Transfaransi Anggaran (KASTA) NTB Penulis
  • Ruslan Institut Elkatarie Penulis

Kata Kunci:

Societal welfare, socioeconomic determinants, human capital, financial inclusion, social capital, social protection, systematic literature review

Abstrak

Purpose: This study aims to synthesize empirical evidence on the determinants of societal welfare from a socioeconomic perspective in order to build a comprehensive and integrated analytical framework, given that prior literature has tended to examine these determinants separately. Methodology: The study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Literature searches were conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar for publications from 2015 to 2025, using combinations of the keywords “social welfare,” “socioeconomic determinants,” “income inequality,” “human capital,” “social capital,” and “financial inclusion.” Following identification, screening, and eligibility assessment, a set of indexed, peer-reviewed journal articles was analyzed thematically. Results: The synthesis shows that societal welfare is a multidimensional construct shaped by the interaction of seven principal determinants: education, income, employment opportunity, health, financial inclusion, social capital, and social protection. Education and health function as the foundation of human capital, employment and income serve as direct economic transmission channels, financial inclusion and social capital act as structural enablers that strengthen household economic resilience, while social protection operates as a corrective policy mechanism for vulnerable groups. Conclusion and Implications: Welfare cannot be reduced to income growth alone but requires a holistic, cross-dimensionally integrated policy approach. The policy implications underscore the need for synergy among investment in education, expanded access to health services, strengthened financial inclusion, multidimensional-poverty-based targeting, and the development of social capital as a multisectoral strategy for enhancing societal welfare, particularly in developing-country contexts

Referensi

Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.

Biru, W. A., Otieno, D. J., & Mahuna, B. (2024). The impact of financial inclusion initiatives: Evidence from meta-analysis. Journal of International Development, 36(8), 2926–2958. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3943

Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S., & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. World Bank.

Huang, J., & Fang, Y. (2021). Income inequality, neighbourhood social capital and subjective well-being in China: Exploration of a moderating effect. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 6799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136799

International Labour Organization. (2021). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2021. ILO.

Kayadibi, S., Gözaçan, N. B., & Çakmak, O. (2024). Financial inclusion and fintech: A state-of-the-art systematic literature review. Financial Innovation, 10, Article 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00741-0

Ma, Z. (2025). A systematic literature review of human capital and education policy 2014–2024. Higher Education Research, 10(6), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251006.12

Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative & United Nations Development Programme. (2024). 2024 global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI): Poverty amid conflict. UNDP. https://hdr.undp.org/content/2024-global-multidimensional-poverty-index-mpi

OECD. (2015). In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. OECD.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Quispe-Torreblanca, E., De Neve, J.-E., & contributors. (2026). Social status and the relationship between income rank and well-being in 109 nations. Nature Communications. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69729-x

Saidi, A., Mensah, K., & Owusu, F. (2024). Effects of conditional and unconditional cash transfers on poverty reduction, education, and health outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa: A PRISMA approach. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2024.2426807

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. OECD.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.

United Nations Development Programme. (2022). Human development report 2021/2022: Uncertain times, unsettled lives. UNDP.

United Nations Development Programme. (2025). Human development report 2025: A matter of choice: People and possibilities in the age of AI. UNDP.

World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains. World Bank.

World Health Organization. (2021). World health statistics 2021: Monitoring health for the SDGs. WHO.

Diterbitkan

2026-06-10